Does more protein actually build more muscle?
In women aged 40–77, increasing protein intake beyond standard levels did not significantly increase skeletal muscle mass, whether they did strength training alone or combined with cycling.
Test your knowledge
🔬 The Breakdown
Context: This highlights a common misconception: that expensive, high-protein supplements are a requirement for muscle maintenance. The data suggests that for this demographic, the specific amount of protein isn't the primary driver of muscle growth.
Reality Check: The study showed that while protein didn't change muscle mass, strength training specifically improved leg power, while cycling improved aerobic fitness. Balancing both types of exercise can be time-consuming and physically demanding.
Takeaway: Focus on consistent resistance training to build strength, and don't feel pressured to buy expensive high-protein powders to see results.
Published September 15, 2026
The science, explained
Evidence Check: This was a randomized controlled trial of 108 women (with 83 completing the full study) who were assigned to different exercise and protein groups.
Conventional Wisdom Check: This refines the common belief that 'more protein is always better' by showing that, within the tested range, extra protein didn't significantly change muscle mass outcomes for this group.
Everyday Translation: You can feel confident that hitting a moderate protein goal will support your goals without needing to obsess over the highest possible dose to see muscle results.